IPCC – Back to the Little Ice Age?



11/15/2018 19:20 - Posted by Tom van Leeuwen
Recently, the IPCC published it's “Summary for Policymakers 2018 - An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.”

The strange thing is that the IPCC never defines what they mean by “pre-industrial levels”. Do they mean the Holocene Optimum, 8,000 years ago, when temperatures were 4°C warmer than now? That’s a pre-industrial level. Or do they mean the depths of the latest glacial period, 15,000 years ago, with temperatures more than 15°C below the current averages? That’s a pre-industrial level as well.


It’s not until page 6, after repeating “pre-industrial levels” a large number of times, that the phrase is substituted once, and only once, by “the 1850–1900 period”, somehow indicating that is the pre-industrial period they're referring to. After that, it’s back to the very unscientific “pre-industrial levels” wording.
Clearly, the IPCC wants to make sure to frame that the supposed warming has something to do with industrialization.

 
What they do not tell you is that the 1850-1900 period marks the end of the “Little Ice Age”, the coldest period of the Holocene (the last 10,000 years.)
Wikipedia describes that period as “Europeans sought explanations for the famine, disease, and social unrest that they were experiencing”, and “… consequences of the Little Ice Age: livestock epidemics, cows that gave too little milk, late frosts, and unknown diseases.

Is that the type of world the IPCC wants to lead us back to?

The warming we observe is nothing more than the return to the normal situation during the Holocene, leaving behind the extremes of the Little Ice Age.

On a brighter side, the IPCC now forecasts 26-77 cm sea-level rise until 2100 instead of the 26-82 cm they predicted 5 years ago. Maybe they need a couple of additional special meetings at exotic locations in order to discover that the sea level rise is not accelerating at all and that all of the forecasts that were made 30 years ago have failed.

 

Please donate

Fighting the climate hysteria is time-consuming! If you think I'm on the right track and you want to support my efforts I would be more than happy to receive a small donation that will help me to maintain this site.


Thanks!


The fingerprints of the greenhouse effect

The hypothesis of "man-made climate change" tells us that the increase in the concentration of CO2 enhances the greenhouse effect of the atmosphere and has global warming as a final result.

Since the beginning of the industrialized era around 1850, man emits relatively large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere through the use of fossil fuels. The consequence of these emissions is that during that period, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere increased sharply from about 300 parts per million to more than 400 ppm, an increase of almost 40%. The average temperature increased in the same period more or less 1.5 °C with a small variation depending on the data source used.
Read more...

Why did the warming stop?

The political reports of the IPCC are based on the hypothesis that CO2 is the most important control knob of the Earth's temperature. The problem is that this hypothesis does not correspond at all with the empirical data available to science. Forecasts are made using models that are not capable of 'predicting' the past.
Read more...

Temperature versus CO2 – the big picture

When discussing “Climate Change” it’s good to have an understanding of how the Earth’s climate has changed in the past. That will give us a reference to decide whether the current changes are normal or not.

Global temperatures have varied a lot over the last 500 million years. Depending on the timescale used, the current temperature is either cold or hot, so when you want to know the “normal temperature” you’ll have to indicate what timescale you’re using.
Read more...

Sydney Sea-Level Rise

According to the IPCC CO2-hypothesis, rising CO2-levels leads to warming. That warming supposedly expands sea-water and melts glaciers and polar ice-caps, finally resulting in rising sea-levels. They warn us for catastrophic sea-level rises in the year 2100 and beyond because of this process.


Sydney is strategically located between the Indian, Pacific, and Southern oceans. CO2-levels went up from 300 to 400 parts per million over the past 100 years. What's the impact on Sydney's sea-level?
Read more...

Democracy? Make your choice!

In recent centuries the power of governments has become stronger and stronger. The governments got involved increasingly deeper into our lives and the citizens, the individuals, have ever less to say about ever more issues.

Climate policy is an excellent example of this interference. The government relies on completely unreliable data, unproven hypotheses, and ideas while the consequences of this interference affect everyone. At present, governments worldwide are about to make cheap and reliable energy sources -that form the basis of our economic prosperity- inaccessible. The results are far-reaching.
Read more...

Censored and kicked by a Facebook group!

Yesterday I decided to post my Four Interglacials to a Facebook group called "Global Warming Denialism is a Big Oil agenda".

It was an educational experience.
Read more...

About consensus, "97%", and settled science

There are four misconceptions about science that are commonly used by catastrophic man-made warming advocates. Normally, when you try to start a conversation on the subject, their first reply will be one of these four "arguments".
Read more...

Atmospheric CO2 distribution

On the above world map we see the average level of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere over five weeks in 2014. Credit: NASA / JPL-Caltech.
Read more...